Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-263942-20160124013623/@comment-263942-20160126123000

At least that settles things. Imo we should have a votes for consensus ala-Wikipedia or an emergency council on or off-site, so as not to end up in "judge, jury and executioner"-esque decisions that may jeopardize this project (and consequently our friendships with each other). Trusted non-admin users are also welcome to provide their input, and as what I came to realise when I participated in a deletion discussion over a hoax article in Wikipedia, it's the quality and substance of individual votes that matter, not necessarily the number of yes or no votes in it, rendering majority decisions moot.