Board Thread:Wiki Management/@comment-4356266-20170122083338/@comment-27187866-20170209050553

Mfaizsyahmi wrote: We have unfortunately skipped the matter of determining "generation", specifically with Del who returned after a very long dormancy. I'll be appropriating this thread to continue discussion into that matter.

Since I've never heard of him back in 2nd gen, and he only ever made 3 parodies of unknown view count (as it was back then), under our current notability requirements I don't think he could be considered notable and have a page back then.

Due to the lack of policy regarding "gens" he's able to have his way, request to be put into 2nd gen, which is highly unrepresentative of the current situation keeping in mind the years-long gap between activity.

So I propose for the case of being a long-time dormant, that unless he's already known from back then he should not be classified as the "older gen", only the current one (ie whenever he made the return).

I classified him under 2nd gen because he asked to be classified as such. Considering the 3 parodies he made back then are the bulk of his parody views I say that he should be classified as what he wants.

Also there's Gilblitz112, and the fact that he's also able to be classified as 2nd Gen. Then again he's ok with being classified as 4th so no problem there. I think it should be up to the Unterganger provided the parodies they made back then are now notable.